PEMF Infrared Therapy Mat Comparison Matrix - Factory sourcing support for pemf therapy mat

PEMF infrared therapy mat supplier comparison matrix

Normalize factory replies before deciding which proposal deserves deeper review. The matrix separates requested values, supplier confirmations, alternatives, evidence references and buyer approval. It is a procurement tool, not a score of medical effectiveness, product safety or regulatory acceptance.

Use one row for every decision variable

Comparison row	Buyer request	Supplier response	Approval note
Mat format and dimensions	Full-length, split-zone or foldable; requested measurements	Exact offered dimensions and tolerances to confirm	Accept, reject or review alternative
Layers and inserts	Requested construction questions and material restrictions	Layer sequence, insert description and supplier exceptions	Evidence or sample check owner
PEMF controls	Requested control, interface and operating parameters	Exact offered values and controller identification	Technical review required
Infrared or light elements	Requested function, location, controls and power basis	Component scope and applicable documentation	Keep claims outside procurement approval
Power and accessories	US destination, plug basis, controller, adapter and bag	Included and separately priced items	Confirm complete quoted set
Commercial scope	Quantity by variant, pack unit, timing and delivery basis	MOQ, currency, price basis, exclusions and assumption	Normalize total procurement scope

Never convert a blank cell into an assumed match. If a supplier offers a substitute, copy it into a separate alternative line with its commercial effect and approval owner.

Attach evidence to the line it supports

Identify

Record the factory, exact model or proposed specification and document revision.

Match

Check whether names, numbers and described components correspond to the quotation.

Limit

Note what the evidence does not establish, including unsupported health outcomes or other models.

Assign

Name the buyer, lab or qualified adviser responsible for the unresolved decision.

A certificate, report, label or manual for a related series must not be presented as exact-model proof. Sampling can confirm observable acceptance points, but it does not replace applicable testing, legal or professional review.